Which statement best describes OPT's composition?

• A. Representation from all staff sections
• B. Representation from external contractors
• C. Only planning staff
• D. Only senior officers

Answer: (A)

The key idea is cross-functional input. An OPT benefits most when it includes representation from all staff sections—operations, intelligence, logistics, personnel, medical, legal, communications, finance, and other functional areas. This broad makeup brings the diverse expertise and constraints of the entire command into planning, so dependencies, risks, and resource needs across domains are identified early and addressed. It also helps secure buy-in from every part of the organization, making the plan more feasible and executable.

If the team were limited to planning staff only, or restricted to senior officers, critical perspectives from other areas could be missed, leading to gaps in the plan. Relying on external contractors for core input would detach the plan from internal capabilities and priorities. So, representation from all staff sections best describes how the OPT should be composed.